With RFix
- Place emitters and a receiver on the RF map.
- Connect signals, interference, and ITU-R or Sionna paths.
- Inspect the IQ and export labels, SigMF, and the source project.
Desktop Startup
Loading interface...
Preparing the renderer process.
RFix vs Sionna
RFix makes Sionna RT usable inside a complete visual workflow with signal design, maps, ITU-R models, interference, IQ analysis, traceable datasets, APIs, and MCP. Sionna alone provides powerful differentiable PHY, system simulation, and ray tracing, but teams must build the surrounding product workflow in code.
RFix advantage: Visual Sionna and ITU-R scenarios that finish as usable, traceable IQ datasets.
Choose Sionna (NVIDIA) mainly for: Differentiable PHY/SYS research and direct radio ray tracing.
Why choose RFix
RFix removes the integration work between scenario design, propagation, IQ analysis, datasets, and automation.
You want Sionna-based propagation inside a visual map, signal, analysis, and dataset product.
You need ITU-R models, interference scenarios, and labeled IQ/SigMF in the same workflow.
You want batch or MCP automation without building and maintaining every surrounding product layer.
Workflow advantage
| Capability | RFix | Sionna (NVIDIA) |
|---|---|---|
| Product scope | Integrated product for RF design, scenes, propagation, IQ, datasets, and automation. | Open-source Python modules for PHY, system-level simulation, and radio ray tracing.[1] |
| Visual authoring | Drag-and-drop signal graph and map are the primary scenario interface. | Python and Jupyter notebooks connect modular components into research simulations.[1][2] |
| Maps & terrain | Visual RF placement, motion, terrain, and height-aware editing tied to the graph. | Models 3D scenes and paths, but has no RF project map or dataset workspace.[1] |
| Propagation & research | Combines Sionna RT paths with terrestrial and earth-space ITU-R models. | Differentiable RT, PHY, and SYS with PyTorch, Mitsuba 3, Dr.Jit, and GPUs.[1] |
| IQ import & analysis | Interactive spectrogram and time-domain analysis for measured or generated IQ. | Tensor and array analysis through Python and notebook visualizations.[1] |
| Labels & deliverables | Built-in labels, raw IQ, SigMF pairs, and portable visual projects. | Users build labels, storage, and packaging around framework tensors.[1] |
| RF hardware | Built-in SDR I/O plus paired VSG/analyzer control, waveform playback, measurements, IQ capture, and SCPI. | No built-in VSG, signal-analyzer, or general SCPI instrument workbench.[1] |
| Automation & AI agents | Batch APIs and native MCP tools plan, generate, inspect, and export RF projects. | No native MCP project or RF dataset workflow; automation uses the Python modules.[1] |
| Licensing | Commercial platform with free and licensed capabilities. | Open source and free.[1] |
Concrete workflow
Specialist exception
Choose Sionna (NVIDIA) primarily when one of these specialist requirements matters more than an integrated scenario-to-IQ workflow:
RFix packages Sionna propagation with visual authoring, maps, ITU-R, interference, IQ analysis, datasets, APIs, and MCP. Choose Sionna directly mainly for differentiable research or low-level ray-tracing control.
The fastest way to compare is on your data. We can generate a sample labeled dataset from a scenario like yours so you can judge the fit directly.
Explore RFix
Verification
Published ยท Last reviewed